For court cases Advocate Jamila is the best online advocate in Pakistan from the law firms in Lahore. Issues Courts below decreed the suit. Limitation point, Appreciation of evidence Validity. Without valid and legal title vests in the purchase, it cannot claim any legal title on ownership of an unregistered land document through the best online advocate in Pakistan from the law firms in Lahore. Our best advocates in Lahore Pakistan & Top Advocates in Lahore Pakistan is here for services of all kind of case Choose the Best advocate in Pakistan Through The List of advocates in Lahore Pakistan.
There was no explanation to that effect as to why the plaintiff had filed suit so delayed. The period prescribed for filing suit based agreement to sell is three years from the denial. There was no evidence on file where denial was made by the defendant lastly, and as such, the suit being hopelessly time-barred, was liable to be dismissed. There was no receipt regarding alleged sale consideration. The sale consideration had not proved a prime factor. None of the elders had been produced by the plaintiff to prove to convene Jirga/arbitration or payment of sale consideration.
Even the plaintiff himself through the best online advocate in Pakistan from the law firms in Lahore could not prove the payment of sale consideration or the oral Sale in his favor through cogent evidence. Marginal witnesses were also silent as to how it paid sale consideration to the defendant. No proper evaluation had been made by Courts below in true perspective. Impugned judgments/decrees of Courts below were set aside by High Court. Civil revision petition accepted/suit dismissed. The takeover of land to establish a Jinnah colony. Respondent-ex-owner had received consideration for mutually entered into the transaction. Allegedly said the Government had not utilized the land for the purpose qua it took it over, respondent filed suit that land is returned to him.
Trial Court decreed the suit through the best online advocate in Pakistan from the law firms in Lahore; however, the same was dismissed by Appellate Court below. While allowing civil revision, High Court restored the judgment/decree of Trial Court: (i) "Whether the Punjab Land Acquisition Rules, 1983 would be attracted to the instant case. Land in dispute which hit had acquired (taken over) by appellants under the act, 1986, for Jinnah Abadi Scheme/Colony, whether such scheme/purpose had been abandoned. If that being so, the respondent (owner) was entitled to return of such land. Moot points Factual/legal analysis. Land in question is taken over by mutual negotiation between parties.
Respondent did receive an amount of Rs. 58093/- as a consideration/price of the takeover, according to the transaction and envisaged by mutation. Land in question was taken over by appellants undoubtedly for establishing Jinnah Abadi, and that takes over/acquisition was not in term of Act 1894. It was also not under the owner's donation, rather simplicity through mutual negotiation between parties for the owner's price. The transaction was like a sale through the best online advocate in Pakistan from the law firms in Lahore. Even if the land had not been utilized so far by appellants for Jinnah Colony, there was no provision in the act. Any instructions issued by the competent auth that on the lapse of a particular period, the abandoned should presume of express abandonment of the object the land should necessarily under some express provisions of law had to return to the landowner. Our female lawyer in Lahore Pakistan is here for services of all kind of lawsuit.